New transgender medicine scandal uncovered by the New York Times. LGBTQ+ pediatrician Johanna Olson-Kennedy, a well-known activist and researcher, admitted to concealing a study on puberty blockers because the results showed no improvement in mental health.

---

 

New scandal linked to gender ideology.

Johanna Olson-Kennedy, an LGBTQ+ pediatrician and activist, conducted a two-year study but chose not to publish the results, as they did not demonstrate any mental health improvements in children with gender dysphoria following hormonal treatments.

The revelation came from none other than the New York Times, typically a staunch voice of unfettered progressive ideals, which has, however, recently taken a more cautious stance on this issue.

 

The previous WPATH scandal

This revelation has sparked a media uproar, intensifying the ongoing debate over gender identity and prompting an investigation into the researcher.

Just months earlier, internal emails (available here) from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), the leading authority on gender transition care, had come to light.

These leaks revealed that gender therapists privately acknowledged performing experimental procedures on minors, despite knowing they were carcinogenic and lacking informed consent. This case was described (also here) as “the medical scandal of the century.”

 

The LGBTQ+ pediatrician conceals her own research

Now, back to pediatrician Olson-Kennedy, a vocal advocate for trans therapies and director of the largest gender clinic in the United States, based at the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles.

She is a staunch proponent of hormonal and surgical mutilation for children with gender dysphoria, arguing it is the best method to save them from despair and suicide.

However, the New York Times revealed that Olson-Kennedy’s own research proves otherwise.

The 95 young patients she and her colleagues observed over two years—using $10 million in federal grants from the National Institutes of Health—showed no improvement.

So the pediatrician simply chose to bury the study to avoid providing ammunition to the growing contingent of researchers opposed to these practices.

“I don’t want our work to be weaponized” to convince more states to ban procedures for transgender youth, she told the American daily.

Writer J.K. Rowling ironically commented:

“We can’t publish a study that says we are harming children because people who say we are harming children will use the study as evidence that we are harming children, which might make it harder for us to keep harming them.”

 

Johanna Olson-Kennedy: Who is the Trans-Activist Researcher?

But who is Johanna Olson-Kennedy?

For those unfamiliar, Olson-Kennedy is a pioneer in pediatric gender care and a researcher deeply committed to the trans industry.

She is herself married to a transgender woman (a woman identifying as a man), the social worker Aydin Olson-Kennedy, who acts as a bridge between gender-confused minors and pediatric clinics (including Olson-Kennedy’s own), signing every document required to place young patients on the “transgender conveyor belt”—from a pre-pubertal dysphoria diagnosis straight to surgery.

Olson-Kennedy is also the President-Elect of the US Professional Association for Transgender Health (USPATH).

In a video that surfaced in 2018, she advocates for the mutilation of healthy breasts in underage girls with gender dysphoria, dismissing potential regret as a rare occurrence (which is untrue!). She casually states that if a young mastectomy victim were to regret losing her breasts, she could always “go get them back.”

 

Scientific Studies Driven by the LGBTQ+ Community

It should come as no surprise that scientific research can be so easily manipulated by rainbow activists.

The issue of conflicts of interest among the authors of the few studies “favoring” transition therapies is a regular occurrence.

Consider that the remaining favorable clinical positions are largely based on particularly poor-quality studies by psychiatrist Jack Turban, an activist who is openly gay.

This is much like how the American Psychological Association (APA) remains heavily influenced in its favorable stance on same-sex parenting by its leading researcher, Charlotte Patterson, who is herself openly lesbian, in a same-sex relationship, and an LGBTQ+ activist.