{"id":1309,"date":"2018-08-31T09:54:25","date_gmt":"2018-08-31T09:54:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.uccronline.it\/eng\/?p=1309"},"modified":"2018-09-01T00:22:23","modified_gmt":"2018-09-01T00:22:23","slug":"charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/","title":{"rendered":"Charges against the Pope: former Nuncio Vigan\u00f2 lied, here the proofs"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Pope Francis did not want to comment the indictment former Nuncio Carlo Maria Vigan\u00f2<\/strong>\u00a0published<\/a><\/em> against him; instead, the Pope asked the journalists to judge it for themselves. Thus, in few hours, the<\/strong> Editorial Staff of UCCR<\/strong> took seriously the\u00a0memorandum<\/em> by Vigan\u00f2 and his exhortation by the Pope and found out overwhelming evidence<\/u><\/strong> belying the key passage of the testimony of the already controversial ex Nuncio, so as to dismiss<\/strong> (or, at least, to scale down considerably) the charges.<\/p>\n

However, before we go on, four<\/strong> clarifications are necessary (who is impatient can look onwards<\/a><\/strong>).
\n1) What Vigan\u00f2\u2019s accusation is:<\/u><\/strong> the ex nuncio did not accuse the Pope of having covered an act of paedophilia performed by Card. McCarrick; he accused him of not having listened to him when in 2013 he would have told him about the various reports\/rumours on the Cardinal concerning sexual relationships with adults<\/strong> (seminarists) dating back to fifty years before; Vigan\u00f2 also says to have made Pope Francis aware of the fact that, for this reason, Benedict XVI would have \u00abordered him to withdraw<\/em><\/strong> to a life of prayer and penance<\/em>\u00bb. Vigan\u00f2 writes: although Pope Francis \u00ablearnt from me at least on June 23, 2013<\/em>\u00bb about the \u00abcrimes committed by McCarrick, who abused his authority with seminarians and priests<\/em>\u00bb; the Pope would have \u00abcovered him to the bitter end; indeed, he made McCarrick\u2019s\u00a0advice his own<\/em>\u00bb and allowed the Cardinal to disobey Ratzinger\u2019s order<\/strong>. We are not dealing with paedophilia, nor does he accuse him of having covered a paedophile<\/strong>, also because the charge of child abuse emerged only in 2018. As soon as the Archdiocese of New York received and deemed \u201ccredible\u201d this charge of child abuse towards McCarrick (dated 1977), Francis immediately intervened<\/strong> removing him from the public ministry.<\/p>\n

2) Mediatic operation<\/u><\/strong>. Beside the contents of the charge, the \u201cVigan\u00f2 operation\u201d is not the tesimony of the conscience of a \u201ccourageous bishop\u201d, as is passed off by the representatives of the traditionalist resistance<\/em>. It is simply a qualitative leap<\/strong> in their war of hatred against the Pope, after they failed with the anonymous posters and the ridiculous accusation of heresy contained in the \u201cCorrectio filialis<\/em>\u201d. For days, in the blogs of the haters of Francis there were rumours of a \u201csurprise\u201d<\/strong> for the World Meeting of Families<\/em>, as they had not been able either to silence or to overshadow it mediatically through a parallel meeting (whose honorary guest was Card. Burke), which turned out to be a flop<\/strong> (widely publicised in Italy by La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana<\/em>, Marco Tosatti, Aldo Maria Valli, and\u00a0Corrispondenza Romana<\/em>). The 11\u00a0pages of accusation by Archbishop Vigan\u00f2 were meanwhile published<\/strong> on the resistance\u2019s<\/em> blog, starting from LifeSite News<\/em>\u00a0(whose founder, John-Henry Westen, had organised the unsuccessful parallel event in Dublin), and few minutes after its publication conservative Bishop Joseph Strickland from Tyler (Texas) distributed<\/a><\/em> copies of the dossier at all Masses. All this shows there is a plan behind it. In Italy the \u201cPapal resignation\u201d operation was entrusted to\u00a0Marco Tosatti and to Maurizio Belpietro (director of\u00a0La Verit\u00e0)<\/em>, which says a lot about the little professionality of this put-on.<\/p>\n

3) Vigan\u00f2 and his dark biography<\/u><\/strong>. Somebody has criticised us for having reminded<\/a><\/em> the murky past of Msgr. Vugan\u00f2 (called by us \u201cdark\u201d), and we have been told that this is an argumentum ad personam<\/em><\/strong>. As a matter of fact, we highlighted the validity of the charges by the ex Nuncio as they were detailed with dates, names, and meetings, but we also pointed out the absence of proofs and documents to substantiate them. Vigan\u00f2 therefore asks us<\/strong> to trust him<\/strong>, his reconstruction of the facts, his suppositions, his memories, and his version. For this reason, it is important to show that he is not a reliable person at all, and the scandals having involved him<\/strong> prove it (as we shall see at the following point), as was also observed<\/a><\/em>, amongst many others, by the main US Vaticanist, John L. Allen<\/strong>: \u00abViagn\u00f2 himself acknowledges that his comments are based on no more than supposition<\/strong> and\/or connecting the dots. When anyone hurls around accusations quite so lightly, it\u2019s difficult to know how seriously any one ought to be taken<\/em>\u00bb.<\/p>\n

4) Vigan\u00f2 destroyed the evidence for the coverage of abuses<\/u><\/strong>. The story of Msgr. Vigan\u00f2 is as murky as the petty operation he put in place. In these hours the Vaticanist of Rai1, Aldo Maria Valli<\/strong>, member of the resistance<\/em> and chosen by Vigan\u00f2 as the depositary of his report, is portraying the ex Nuncio as a \u201cgood and holy grandpa\u201d<\/strong>, keen on the truth and with a burning love for his Church, so much so as to make his testimony public in honour of God. Valli keeps, though, silent on the involvement<\/a><\/em> of the holy man Vigan\u00f2 in fraudolent public procurements<\/strong> and false invoicing<\/strong>, on the fact that the ex Nuncio had to<\/a><\/em> pay 180 thousand Swiss Francs to his sister Rosanna, who denounced<\/strong> him for misappropriation of money, on the fact that his brother, Msgr. Lorenzo Vigan\u00f2, publically\u00a0stated<\/a><\/em>: \u00abMy brother stole from me<\/em><\/strong>; he took advantage of my illness to cut me off from the administration of our \u2013 I stress our \u2013 patrimony<\/em>\u00bb. It is omitted the fact that Benedict XVI sent him away to the USA and that he (Vigan\u00f2) objected to this decision<\/a><\/em> by shamelessly lying<\/strong> to him. In these hours Luigi Bisignani<\/strong>\u00a0revealed<\/a><\/em> other stains on the life of Msgr. Vigan\u00f2, including the habit of creating false dossiers to sully his enemies. We did not write what we have only recently learnt<\/a><\/em>: thanks to his role of Apostolic Nuncio in the USA, he intervened to stifle a sex abuse enquiry<\/strong> and to destroy the evidence for the coverage of sexual abuses concerning his conservative friend John Nienstedt, ex Archbishop of St. Paul and Minneapolis <\/a>(who confirmed the coverage in 2014).<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

THE LIE OF MSGR. VIGAN\u00d2: THE CHARGE AGAINST FRANCIS COLLAPSES<\/u><\/strong>
\nTaking seriously the testimony of Carlo Maria Vigan\u00f2, we deduce that the charge against Pope Francis \u2013 as we have already said \u2013 is to have disregarded the alleged order of Benedict XVI<\/strong> to card. McCarrick\u00a0to lead a life of silence and prayer because of his immoral conduct when he was a priest. Vigan\u00f2 does not bring evidence for the intervention of the Pope Emeritus; he only says: \u00abI do not know when Pope Benedict took these measures against McCarrick, whether in 2009 or 2010<\/strong>,\u00a0because\u00a0in the meantime\u00a0I had been transferred<\/em>\u00bb. However, he accuses the Pope of having let the prelate lead a public life, celebrate Masses, go to the Vatican<\/strong>, and give advice on nominations. Here Vigan\u00f2\u2019s words: \u00abIt was also clear\u00a0that, from the time<\/strong> of Pope Francis\u2019s election, McCarrick, now<\/strong> free from all\u00a0constraints<\/strong>, had felt free to travel continuously, to give lectures and interviews\u00a0[\u2026] he had become the kingmaker\u00a0for appointments in the Curia and the UnitedStates, and the most listened to advisor in the Vatican for relations with the Obama administration<\/em>\u00bb. The Pope \u2013 here is the accusation by Vigan\u00f2 (underlined in bold in his testimony) \u2013 \u00abmust honestly state when he first learned about the crimes committed by McCarrick, who abused his authority with seminarians and priests. In any cases, the Pope learned it from me on June 23, 2013 and continued to cover for him. He did not take into account<\/strong> the sanctions that Pope Benedict had imposed on him and made him his trusted counselor along with Maradiaga<\/em>\u00bb.<\/p>\n

In spite of this, Vigan\u00f2 is lying. Widening the very good job by Michael J. O\u2019Loughlin, we have indeed discovered that McCarrick was leading a blissful and untroubled public life well before the Pontificate of Francis<\/strong> (March 2013). On the 29th of March 2011<\/a><\/em>, indeed, McCarrick witnessed in front of the Senate of the United States even \u00abon behalf<\/em><\/strong> of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops<\/em>\u00bb, with the objective of protecting \u00abthe civil rights of Muslim Americans<\/em>\u00bb. On\u00a0June 2011<\/a><\/em>, McCarrick celebrated the Mass for the important ordination of some priests, and on October of the same year<\/em><\/a> he concelebrated with the Archbishop of New York, Timothy Dolan, even in Saint Patrick\u2019s Cathedral,\u00a0that is the main Catholic place of worship<\/strong> in New York. On\u00a0December 2011<\/a><\/em> the Cardinal participated in Meet the press<\/em>,\u00a0a very popular TV programme of the NBC, where he accepted two prizes.<\/p>\n

On the 16th of January 2012<\/a><\/em>\u00a0McCarrick was in the Vatican<\/strong>, where he was received in audience by Benedict XVI as member of a selection<\/strong> of US Bishops, and on the same occasion<\/a><\/em> he concelebrated Mass with Card. Wuerl and other Bishops from the US by the tomb of Saint Peter. On April 2012<\/a><\/em>, Card. McCarrick was again in the Vatican<\/strong>, as member of the Papal Foundation<\/em>\u00a0to celebrate the 83rd birthday of Pope Benedict<\/strong>. On the 28th of February 2013 McCarrick was even present at the meeting with Benedict XVI on the historic day of his resignation: in this picture<\/a><\/em> the Pope Emeritus greets him and shakes hands with him<\/strong>, as he did with all the Cardinals. Ironically, on May 2013<\/a><\/em>\u00a0(two months after the election of Pope Francis) Archbishop Vigan\u00f2 himself blissfully concelebrated<\/strong> \u2013 without any problem or protest on his part \u2013 a Mass together with none less than Cardinal McCarrick,\u00a0before the yearly supper of the Cardinals of the Catholic University of America.<\/p>\n

Thus, it is clear that Msgr. Vigan\u00f2 blatantly lied<\/strong> precisely in his main accusation against Francis. Card. McCarrick, contrary to what the former Nuncio states in his testimony, led a public life until the end of the Pontificate of Benedict XVI, by being even present at the Vatican and before the eyes of the Pope Emeritus himself, and he did not start all this only at the moment of the election of Francis.<\/p>\n

The solutions are two<\/strong>:
\n1)<\/strong> Benedict XVI did not intervene<\/strong> to order the American Cardinal to lead an isolated life of prayer, and consequently Vigan\u00f2 is a liar. The accusation against Francis<\/strong> of having disregarded such inexistent order collapses<\/strong>. Vigan\u00f2 lies when he writes he had reminded Francis of the false intervention of the Pope Emeritus, or he lied to Bergoglio, too (since there was no intervention by Ratzinger against McCarrick).
\n2)<\/strong> Benedict XVI intervened<\/strong> against McCarrick but \u2013 as shown by us \u2013 allowed the Cardinal, accused of a sexual immoral life, not to obey the authority of the Pope and therefore to celebrate Mass, participate in the life of the US Church and in the life of the Vatican, even on his birthday. Thus the charge against Francis would be scaled down<\/strong>, as it was his predecessor the first to disregard his own order. Vigan\u00f2 remains a liar because he claimed that the Cardinal had disobeyed Ratzinger\u2019s imposition of a private life only when Francis was elected.<\/p>\n

The \u201cresignation operation<\/em>\u201d set up by the traditionalist resistance<\/em> against Francis risks becoming a boomerang<\/strong>. In any cases, Vigan\u00f2 lies, because Card. McCarrick led a public life throughout the whole Pontificate of Benedict XVI and did not start only with Francis. Vigan\u00f2 might tell, instead, the truth about Ratzinger\u2019s measure towards towards the Cardinal \u2013 as unhesitatingly held by the self-styled Ratzingerians \u2013, but then the position of Benedict XVI himself gets more complicated<\/strong>, since he is consequently accused of having let Cardinal McCarrick disobey his very order and \u2013 as already said \u2013 freely attend the Archdiocese of New York and the Vatican, while he himself was present. For this reason, the comment<\/a><\/em> of Massimo Faggioli<\/strong> is appropriate: \u00abThe fact that the traditionalist side accepts the risks of damaging Benedict XVI and John Paul II says a lot about their despair<\/em>\u00bb.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

UPDATE AT 18:00<\/u><\/strong>
\nThe Associated Press revealed<\/a><\/em> the name of the director of the \u201cVigan\u00f2 operation<\/em>\u201d: he is called (as we had already suspected) Marco Tosatti<\/strong>\u00a0and is one of the main haters of Pope Francis in Italy, the same hater who a few months ago<\/a><\/em> utterly invented that Francis had created a secret Vatican commission to modify the encyclical Humanae Vitae<\/em>. According to the reconstruction and his own statements, it is the journalist Tosatti to have chosen the time and to have put pressure on the former Nuncio in order that he diffuse his testimony.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

UPDATE AT 19:00<\/u><\/strong>
\nCatholic sociologist Massimo Introvigne<\/strong>\u00a0made<\/a><\/em> a decisive reflection of which we were not aware. We quote it entirely: \u00abAbout \u201csecret measures\u201d by Benedict XVI against McCarrick nobody has ever known anything except Vigan\u00f2, and against other illustrious clergymen charged with harassment Pope Ratzinger took public and clamorous measures. If then the orders of the German Pope were ignored, it would have been Vigan\u00f2, as Apostolic Nuncio and therefore as representative of the Pontiff in Washington, to have to resign<\/strong><\/em>\u00bb. In other words: if Msgr. Vigan\u00f2 tells the truth<\/strong> about this alleged order by the Pope Emeritus towards McCarrick to withdraw to a private life, then Vigan\u00f2 himself is liable<\/strong> for the fact that McCarrick disobeyed that order (as we have demonstrated in this article) during the Pontificate of Benedict XVI by freely attending the Vatican. Indeed, Msgr. Vigan\u00f2 was at that time the Apostolic Nuncio in the USA, that is to say the one who had the task of representing and enforcing the (alleged) order given by the German Pope.<\/p>\n

The Editorial Staff<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Carlo Maria Vigan\u00f2 lied on the main charge against Pope Francis, which is the the intervention of Benedict XVI against Card McCarrick. UCCR discovered that the cardinal attending the Vatican before Francis’s election. The charge against Francis collapses.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1313,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":2,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1078,1077,934,1081,935,1083,1079,1084,283,1076,1082,1080],"class_list":["post-1309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-against-pope-francis","tag-archibishop-vigano","tag-bergoglio","tag-church-usa","tag-critics-of-pope-francis","tag-dismiss","tag-dossier-vigano","tag-francis-dismiss","tag-pope-francis","tag-vigano","tag-vigano-lie","tag-viganos-dossier"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nCharges against the Pope: former Nuncio Vigan\u00f2 lied, here the proofs - UCCR<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Charges against the Pope: former Nuncio Vigan\u00f2 lied, here the proofs - UCCR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Carlo Maria Vigan\u00f2 lied on the main charge against Pope Francis, which is the the intervention of Benedict XVI against Card McCarrick. UCCR discovered that the cardinal attending the Vatican before Francis's election. The charge against Francis collapses.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"UCCR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uccronlineng\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-31T09:54:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-01T00:22:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simone\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simone\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/\",\"name\":\"Charges against the Pope: former Nuncio Vigan\u00f2 lied, here the proofs - UCCR\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-31T09:54:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-01T00:22:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/#\/schema\/person\/4532086d8bfbd5d026fa22701599d109\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"\",\"contentUrl\":\"\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Charges against the Pope: former Nuncio Vigan\u00f2 lied, here the proofs\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/\",\"name\":\"UCCR\",\"description\":\"Union of Catholic Christian Rationalists\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/#\/schema\/person\/4532086d8bfbd5d026fa22701599d109\",\"name\":\"Simone\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/author\/simone\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Charges against the Pope: former Nuncio Vigan\u00f2 lied, here the proofs - UCCR","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Charges against the Pope: former Nuncio Vigan\u00f2 lied, here the proofs - UCCR","og_description":"Carlo Maria Vigan\u00f2 lied on the main charge against Pope Francis, which is the the intervention of Benedict XVI against Card McCarrick. UCCR discovered that the cardinal attending the Vatican before Francis's election. The charge against Francis collapses.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/","og_site_name":"UCCR","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uccronlineng\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-31T09:54:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-01T00:22:23+00:00","author":"Simone","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simone","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/","url":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/","name":"Charges against the Pope: former Nuncio Vigan\u00f2 lied, here the proofs - UCCR","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"","datePublished":"2018-08-31T09:54:25+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-01T00:22:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/#\/schema\/person\/4532086d8bfbd5d026fa22701599d109"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/#primaryimage","url":"","contentUrl":""},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/2018\/08\/31\/charges-against-the-pope-former-nuncio-vigano-lied-here-the-proofs\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Charges against the Pope: former Nuncio Vigan\u00f2 lied, here the proofs"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/","name":"UCCR","description":"Union of Catholic Christian Rationalists","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/#\/schema\/person\/4532086d8bfbd5d026fa22701599d109","name":"Simone","url":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/author\/simone\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1309"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1309"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1309\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1324,"href":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1309\/revisions\/1324"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uccronline.it\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}